Limba italiana: diferèntzias tra is versiones

S'Italianu est istadu adotadu de s'Istadu a pustis de s'unificatzione de s'Italia, essende istadu prima una limba literaria basada a pitzus de sa faeddada toscana de is classes artas de sa sotziedade forentina[<ref>{{Tzita web|url="Italian — University of Leicester". .le.ac.uk. Retrieved 22 October 2015.|tìtulu=[1] Archived 3 October 2009 at the Wayback Machine}}</ref>]. S'isvilupu suo est istadu influentzadu puru de àteras limbas italianas e in misura minore de is limbas germanicas de is invasores a pustis sa rura de s'imperu romanu de otzidente. S'incorporatzione de faeddos cultos de su latinu est un'àtera frma de prestitu lessicale atressu s'influentzia de sa limba iscrita, de sa terminologia iscientifica e de su latinu eclesiasticu. Atessu su mesuevu e su primu pèriodu modernu meda literados italianos fiant literados in latinu purue aici issos ant adotadu meda faeddos in is iscritos issoro e mancari cando faeddaiant puru in italianu. s vocales suas sunt is secundas prus a su costadu de su latinu a pustis de su sardu [<ref>{{Tzita web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classification_of_Romance_languages|tìtulu=See Italica 1950: 46 (cf. [2] and [3]): "Pei, Mario A. "A New Methodology for Romance Classification." Word, v, 2 (Aug. 1949), 135–146. Demonstrates a comparative statistical method for determining the extent of change from the Latin for the free and checked stressed vowels of French, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Rumanian, Old Provençal, and Logudorese Sardinian. By assigning 3½ change points per vowel (with 2 points for diphthongization, 1 point for modification in vowel quantity, ½ point for changes due to nasalization, palatalization or umlaut, and −½ point for failure to effect a normal change), there is a maximum of 77 change points for free and checked stressed vowel sounds (11×2×3½=77). According to this system (illustrated by seven charts at the end of the article), the percentage of change is greatest in French (44%) and least in Italian (12%) and Sardinian (8%). Prof. Pei suggests that this statistical method be extended not only to all other phonological but also to all morphological and syntactical, phenomena.".}}</ref>][<ref>{{Tzita web|url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classification_of_Romance_languages|tìtulu=See Koutna et al. (1990: 294): "In the late forties and in the fifties some new proposals for classification of the Romance languages appeared. A statistical method attempting to evaluate the evidence quantitatively was developed in order to provide not only a classification but at the same time a measure of the divergence among the languages. The earliest attempt was made in 1949 by Mario Pei (1901–1978), who measured the divergence of seven modern Romance languages from Classical Latin, taking as his criterion the evolution of stressed vowels. Pei's results do not show the degree of contemporary divergence among the languages from each other but only the divergence of each one from Classical Latin. The closest language turned out to be Sardinian with 8% of change. Then followed Italian — 12%; Spanish — 20%; Romanian — 23,5%; Provençal — 25%; Portuguese — 31%; French — 44%."}}</ref>].Comente in meda limbas romanzas s'atzentu est peculiare e a s'imbesse de àteras limbas neolatinas s'italianu mantenit sa diferentzia intra vocales curtzas e longas. Belle totu is faeddos e is sillabas in italianu acabbant cun vocales puras, fatore ca portat a impreare is faeddos italiano in sa poesia cun fatzilidade manna. S'italianu tenet unu sistema de vocales cun 7 sonos ('e' e 'o' tenint sonos mesubascios e mesuartos); su latinu clàssicu nde teniat 10, 5 curtzas e 5 longas.{{s}}